Видео

There was no time to get out once the explosives started going off

Even the steel and concrete changed to dust. This was not a 'normal collapse'. In 2006 more than 700 very small pieces of human remains were found on top of the Deutsche Bank building. This is impossible when due to a gravitational collapse… Only 10% of the buildings material remained afterwards. The rest ‘dustified’ end ended up all over Manhattan. Inside job period. Sad but true. RIP to all of the innocent victims❤

He is sincere...but sincerely wrong...the back of JFKs head was hidden from most all of the doctors that day, the body was on its back.

Exactly he is so incoherent. It was a day America will always remember. The darkest day in America when JFK was shot. The Mafia the CIA and many others were involved.

Jeff after 5 congressional commissions we know the truth the HSCA determined that Kennedy was hit by 2 shots from the rear one going through Kennedys body on into Connallys body many forsensic pathologists hsve looked into this the only discenter Cyrill Weck told Vincent Bugliosi in 1986 the shots came from the rear. So common sense tells you regardless what the Parkland Drs said the wound looked like the shots came from the rear the opposite views are not mutually exclusive.

They did not change their mind all the Parkland Drs did not describe the wound the same way thats an old myth. Have you exer read any of these Drs Warren commmissiin testimony? Start with Mr Mccleland. watch the Larry King special from 2003 they tried to save the President all those Drs were in the emergency room in 1963 their testimony doesn't match Mr Mccleland in fact one directly contradicts his testimony saying he seen the entry wound in the bsck of the head there was a massive hole in toward the back of the head that created a bone. flap because of the angle the President was shot causes much confusion.

No magic...they knew that their observations that day were were very quick, not thorough at all....so they had to back off, or look like fools.

Read Jim Leavelle account of why he wore that suit before you start assuming conspiracy bs.

@@randyharris3175 If you read my response, then you would notice that I questioned why he wore a white suit. A QUESTION IS NOT AN ASSUMPTION.

@@jamesmooney8933 The answer to your question is no. My facebook group visited the honarable man known as Jim Leavelle before he died at the age of 99.

Thats complete nonsense why when Mccleland seen the actual autopsy photos in 1988 did he say everyyhing seems the same as he seen it that day the trac was exactly the same.

Nonsense why when Mccleland was asked before the Warren Commission in 1964 do you have an opinion which direction the head shot came from he said it would be impossible to tell. Mccleland is definetely mistaken here saying things we know now that are not true.

@@randyharris3175 *Cite the page and URL of McClelland.'s testimony before the Warren Commission where he allegedly made that statement* Dr. Don Teal Curtis, of Amarillo, was a first year resident at Parkland Hospital in 1963. As one of the first three medical providers to attend to President John F. Kennedy on Nov. 23, 1963, the day he was shot in Dallas. Curtis spoke to a packed Derrick Hall audience at the Panhandle-Plains Historical Museum on Thursday evening.... As he approached the president, he said that he saw what appeared to him to be a large swelling, perhaps an embolism, that he believed was contributing to the president’s difficulty in breathing. With another surgeon beginning a tracheotomy to open the president’s airway, Curtis went to the president’s leg to begin what he called a “cut-down” procedure. He explained that the cut-down procedure was to insert a tube for the rapid insertion of fluids into the patient’s bloodstream to compensate for blood loss. It was then that he noticed brain matter on the president’s pants leg. He added the comment that “brain matter is very easily recognizable.” As he was beginning the cut-down procedure and another doctor was beginning the tracheotomy, a third doctor moved around to the president’s head and lifted it so he could examine the president for any wounds that were not visible from his position, lying on his back. As soon as the doctor lifted the president’ head, he said, “Stop resuscitation. This is not compatible with life.” Curtis reported that each senior physician, and there were several in the room by then, looked at Kennedy’s head. Curtis also looked, and he told the audience “the posterior part of his head was blown out.” Curtis, who had become very familiar with entrance and exit wounds during his trauma room work at Parkland, said that there was no doubt in his mind that the exit wound on the president’s head was at the back....

@@randyharris3175 Kemp Clark, chief of neurosurgery, and one of the attending physicians to JFK while in the Emergency Room, signed typed partial statement about that day at Parkland Memorial Hospital. 8.5" x 11". Dated "Nov 22 1965", and signed "Kemp Clark". Fine condition. Accompanied by a photocopy of the 11 page Kemp Clark Testimony provided to the Warren Commission for additional context. The assassination of President John Kennedy brought forward one of the most controversial investigations of all-time. Mis-documentation, conspiracy theories, conflicting statements, conflicting accounts, movies, books and debates. The entire Warren report was considered a cover up, and all the evidence, and affidavits tampered. On the day of the assassination, Kemp Clark entered the Emergency Room while Dr. Malcom Perry was performing a tracheotomy. He assisted in withdrawing the endotracheal tube from the throat as Dr. Perry was then ready to insert the tracheotomy tube. Dr. Clark then examined the President with findings that his pupils were widely dilated, did not react to light, and his eyes were deviated outward. He then proceeded to examine the wound in the back of the President's head. Per his statement to the Warren commission: "This was a large gaping wound in the right posterior part, with cerebral and cerebellar tissue being damaged and exposed. There was considerable blood loss evident on the carriage, the floor, and the clothing of some of the people present. I would estimate 1,500cc of blood being present … I felt for a carotid pulse and felt none. Therefore I began external cardiac massage. However Dr. Jones stated that he felt a femoral pulse … The cardiotachioscope had been attached and Dr. Found Bashour had arrived. There was transient electrical activity of the President's heart of an undefined type. Approximately, at this time the external cardiac massage became ineffectual and no pulsations could be felt. At this time it was decided to pronounce the President dead … Death was fixed at 1 p.m. … it is first, extremely difficult to state precisely when death occurs … I filled out the death certificate at the request of Dr. George Burkley, the President's physician at the White House … " Dr. Kemp Clark was one of the most significant people interviewed from the day of the Kennedy assassination. His testimony provided to the Warren Commission consists of 11 typed pages. Our signed typed document offered here is dated "November 22, 1965" and shown in full below reiterating some of the salient events from that day: "The President arrived in the Emergency Room at exactly 12:45 p.m. in his limousine. He was in the back seat, Gov. Connally was brought out first and was put in room two. President was put in room one. Dr. Clark pronounced the President dead at 1 p.m. exactly. All of the President's belongings, except his watch which was given to Mr. O.P. Wright, were given to the Secret Service. He left the Emergency Room, the President, at 2 p.m. in an O'Neal ambulance. He was put in a bronze colored plastic casket after being wrapped in a blanket and was taken out of the hospital. The Gov. was taken to the Operating Room. / Kemp Clark."

​@@randyharris3175 Mr. SPECTER. Dr. McClelland, let me ask you to assume a few additional facts, and based on a hypothetical situation which I will put to you and I’ll ask you for an opinion. Assume, if you will, that President Kennedy was shot on the upper right posterior thorax just above the upper border of the scapula at a point 14 cm. from the tip of the right acromion process and 14 cm. below a tip of the right mastoid process, assume further that that wound of entry was caused by a 6.5mm. missile shot out of a rifle having a muzzle velocity of approximately 2,000 feet per second, being located 160 to 250 feet away from President Kennedy, that the bullet entered on the point that I described on the President’s hack, passed between two strap muscles on the posterior aspect of the President’s body and moved through the fascial channel without violating the pleura cavity, and exited in the midline lower third anterior portion of the President’s neck, would the hole which Dr. Perry described to you on the front side of the President’s neck he consistent with the hole which such a bullet might make in such a trajectory through the President’s body? Dr. MCCLELLAND. Yes; I think so. Mr. SPECTER. And what would your reasoning be for thinking that that would be a possible hole of exit on those factors as I have outlined them to you? Dr. MCCLELLAND. Well, I think my reasoning would be basically that the missile was traveling mainly through soft tissue, rather than exploding from a bony chamber and that by the time it reached the neck that it had already lost, because of the distance from which it was fired, even though the muzzle velocity was as you stated-would have already lost a good deal of its initial velocity and kinetic strength and therefore would have perhaps made, particularly, if #it were a fragment of the bullet as bullets do sometimes fragment, could have made a small hole like this in exiting. It certainly could have done that. ______________________________________________________________________________ My commentary: *Of course now we know that the position of the back wound stated by Arlen Specter is incorrect. The position of the backwound was at the level of the third thoracic vertebrae, some 6 inches lower than where Specter claimed the wound was. So Dr. McClelland's response to this question is moot and irrelevant.*